U.S.S. DISCOVERY SIZE

For everything Star Trek related, that isn't covered by the other forums.
Post Reply
patrickivan
Can-Do Captain
Can-Do Captain
Posts: 506
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 3:40 pm

U.S.S. DISCOVERY SIZE

Post by patrickivan »

I've been looking for official sizes for the Discovery to no avail. I feel stupid.

Anyway, in an effort to get some sense of size, I'm using the Eaglemoss images.

Basing Lorca's height over approx. 2 metres, and the window shot from his "mystery" BS room, and placing the Eaglemoss image at 1 pixel conveniently equalling 1 metre, I've got some very rough sizing.

Some confirmation, validation, or input would be appreciated.

It also looks like there are about 14 decks of varying heights (depending on what part of the ship you're in).

74m high with a saucer of 225m across... hmm

Image
MadManMUC
Legendary LT Commander
Legendary LT Commander
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:55 am
Location: Munich, Germany

Re: U.S.S. DISCOVERY SIZE

Post by MadManMUC »

Wow, that would make it about 55 metres longer than Enterprise-E.
DANGER. SPACE DOORS ARE CLOSED.

"I saw it done on Discovery" is no excuse for anything, even breathing.
(With apologies to Tesral for nicking his sig. :mrgreen: )
User avatar
Tesral
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4937
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:58 pm
Location: Dearborn, Mi -- at my desk.
Contact:

Re: U.S.S. DISCOVERY SIZE

Post by Tesral »

And fugly, genuinely fugly.
Garry AKA --Phoenix-- Rising above the Flames.
"I saw it done on Voyager" is no excuse for anything, even breathing.
User avatar
el gato
Fatidical Fleet Admiral
Fatidical Fleet Admiral
Posts: 6050
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:41 pm
Location: In a land whose boundaries are that of imagination

Re: U.S.S. DISCOVERY SIZE

Post by el gato »

Well, 60% of the length of that ship is nacelles, so I wouldn't say it was bigger.

Anyone seen what the underside of that beastie looks like?
RogueWolf wrote:I've sacrificed many dozens (maybe even hundreds) of gummy bears to the dark modeling gods to grant me my wish... but I fear my offerings only amuse them, not appease them.
MadManMUC
Legendary LT Commander
Legendary LT Commander
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:55 am
Location: Munich, Germany

Re: U.S.S. DISCOVERY SIZE

Post by MadManMUC »

Tesral wrote:And fugly, genuinely fugly.
That it is.

And, unless I'm very much mistaken, largely based on Ralph McQuarrie's concept drawings for a new Enterprise prior to TMP, correct?
DANGER. SPACE DOORS ARE CLOSED.

"I saw it done on Discovery" is no excuse for anything, even breathing.
(With apologies to Tesral for nicking his sig. :mrgreen: )
User avatar
el gato
Fatidical Fleet Admiral
Fatidical Fleet Admiral
Posts: 6050
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:41 pm
Location: In a land whose boundaries are that of imagination

Re: U.S.S. DISCOVERY SIZE

Post by el gato »

Correct. McQuarrie did a few concept drawings for the Star Trek sequel, Phase II, that was shelved in favor of TMP

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

A physical model of it was built.

Image

Although that model was not a filming model, it was used in STIII (see if you can spot it)...

Image

... and as one of the canon fodder ships in TNG for the Battle of Wolf 359 scene.

Image

That makes the design canon!
Last edited by el gato on Fri Oct 06, 2017 6:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
RogueWolf wrote:I've sacrificed many dozens (maybe even hundreds) of gummy bears to the dark modeling gods to grant me my wish... but I fear my offerings only amuse them, not appease them.
MadManMUC
Legendary LT Commander
Legendary LT Commander
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:55 am
Location: Munich, Germany

Re: U.S.S. DISCOVERY SIZE

Post by MadManMUC »

Well. With all due respect to Mr McQuarrie's talents on some other franchise ... this, too, is uglier than a jar of pickled arseholes.
DANGER. SPACE DOORS ARE CLOSED.

"I saw it done on Discovery" is no excuse for anything, even breathing.
(With apologies to Tesral for nicking his sig. :mrgreen: )
User avatar
Griffworks
Can-Do Captain
Can-Do Captain
Posts: 959
Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2013 12:57 am
Location: Boundaries of Imagination

Re: U.S.S. DISCOVERY SIZE

Post by Griffworks »

I can't recall where I read it recently, but there's a supposed stated length of 448m in length for Discovery. That puts it at 17.6" / 44.8cm long in 1/1000 scale. I've got one that's a printed model which is 16" / cm long, and the shuttlebay opening with a 1k ST:V shuttle - pretty close to the same dimensions as the ST:V shuttle - in the opening is just large enough to fit a shuttle comfortably thru, but not as large as what we see in ST:D. So, I'm going to eventually order a 17" / 44.8" Discovery and build that.
“And I looked, and behold a pale horse; and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him.“

My Flickr Albums
Post Reply

Return to “General Trek”