Gave them a few coats of Decal Bonder to seal the ink:

Ship's name and registry up close. The tiny USS ABADDON decal will go on the fantail:

Now it's time to Gloss Cote the Abaddon herself.
Thanks Hoss! One of the ideas behind the 20th century dreadnought design was that it would carry a LOT of high caliber guns and the more the better. So that's what I set out to do with this ship.Hossfly72 wrote:I'm liking this one more and more.. Makes me think of the B-29 Superfortress. All "guns" and "go".
There would be a lot of them. This vessel is the second of it's class by the way, the first being the U.S.S. GOLIATH which was lost with all hands when ambushed by a Klingon armada within the first six months of it's launch. It did manage to take out over a dozen D-7's as well as four Klingon battleships during the engagement but in the end it succumbed to the overwhelming numbers of enemy ships arrayed against it. So this ship is the second of the Goliath class of dreadnoughts.Moongrim wrote:I could see a number of Klingon D-7's painted on the side of one of the hulls to indicate the 'success' of that ship.
I got the term super dreadnought from a WIKI page and thought it sounded cool. After a second glance following Vance's post I see the term used with a hyphen (super-dreadnought) usually placed inside quotation marks as in "super-dreadnaught". This leads me to believe that the "super" modifier is somewhat overkill as, by definition, a dreadnought is already the most powerful ship in the fleet. This then begs the question, if this ship, which far outclasses it's contemporary, the Federation class "dreadnought", in firepower, speed, armament, etc then where does that leave the Federation class? Would it still be considered a dreadnought even though it is no longer the most powerful ship in the fleet? By the way, I've decided to do away with the term "super" and just go with "dreadnought" for the ship type.DefiantClient wrote:I love all the greeblies and do dads you're putting on this. Just makes for a more complete and functional ship.
A battle against the E did you say? She might be able to outrun the Abaddon but in a pitched battle she might have trouble penetrating the Abbie's carbon-neutronium alloy armor plating, much less her triple-redundant layered shields. And if the Abbie lands a blow to a vital area of the E with her bow mounted anti-proton beam it could be all over pretty quick; not to mention her mega-phasers fore and aft. Oh and did I mention the Abbie can cloak? No, the E would do well to escape and call for reinforcements.DefiantClient wrote:There can be multiple classes of dreadnought if it were considered a type of ship as opposed to just being the most powerful ship in the fleet. No reason the Federation and the Abaddon can't both be dreadnoughts.
I expect dreadnoughts to be rare, which is why we never see them on the show. That or maybe the term was dropped as basic Federation ships got bigger and more powerful over the years. I'd expect a more advanced ship like the Enterprise-E being able to put up a good fight against your Abaddon. I still like the idea of dreadnoughts still being a thing in TNG, so my head canon gets all kerfuffled.
I didn't mention it in my other comment, but I really like the metallic base you have on this ship. It really makes it different than the Constitution class or other ships using similar parts (Saladin. Ptolemy, Federation, etc).